AN INTERVIEW WITH GOD: A Chat with Writer/Producer Ken Aguado

by Angela Bourassa (@angelabourassa1)

Who wouldn’t jump at the opportunity to meet God and ask any question you’d like? That’s the essential premise of writer/producer Ken Aguado’s new film, An Interview with God. Ken has a track-record in Hollywood spanning 25 years. In addition to his work as a producer and screenwriter, Ken is the co-author of The Hollywood Pitching Bible and a contributor to this site.

Ken recently sat down with me to discuss the faith film market, how to keep a story you’re passionate about contained, and the balance between message and entertainment.

Angela Bourassa: Hi, Ken. Thank you for taking the time to do this.

Ken Aguado: Nice to talk to you. As you know, I’ve been a big fan of your site for years and years.

Angela Bourassa: That’s always nice to hear. So let’s dive in. Is this the first feature length script you ever wrote? 

Ken Aguado: Yes, that’s right, my first script. I was a late bloomer.

Angela Bourassa: How did your experience as a producer inform your writing process? 

Ken Aguado: Really, it was very helpful. When I was thinking about what I might want to write, I knew I didn’t want it to be a superhero film or some other epic. First of all, those kinds of films are really hard to get made, despite the fact that they seem to be everywhere. And I didn’t have access to some well-known IP to adapt, so that was a disadvantage. And, probably like many first-time writers, I wanted to write something meaningful and from the heart. The producer in me knew that the place where dramas were still getting made was in the faith film space. So that’s what I chose.

Angela Bourassa: There does seem to be quite a bit of opportunity, relatively speaking, in the faith film market for interested writers. What advice would you give to a writer crafting a faith-based screenplay, both from a producer’s and a writer’s perspective?

Ken Aguado: Yes, it’s a huge underserved marketplace. And the dramas in that space are usually low budget — under $2.5 million — and many have grossed $30 million to $80 million at the US box office. As for my advice, I think you first must have an affinity for the topic. Most screenwriters I know are not attracted to the genre. Assuming you are, it would be ideal to find a beloved novel or true story to adapt. That always gives you a leg up in the marketplace. But, again, that also means you must be attuned to that part of the marketplace. I had some very specific ideas I wanted to tackle, so my process was to go original.

Angela Bourassa: Was there anything about the writing process that surprised you?

Ken Aguado: I’ve developed so many scripts in my life and worked with so many writers, so I think I already had a good appreciation for the process. I have enormous respect for screenwriters. Weirdly, I probably learned more about myself in the process than screenwriting, per se. For example, one of the underappreciated skills a screenwriter must have is the ability to put their butt in the chair for months at a time and grind through draft after draft. So, I learned that I probably became a producer because I didn’t have that skill! The work-around for me was to write really, really fast, and that’s what I did. I wrote my script in about six weeks, mostly between the quiet time of Thanksgiving through the new year.

Oscar nominee David Strathairn, Ken Aguado, and Brenton Thwaites. Photo by Cara Howe

Angela Bourassa: In this story, you do a great job of continually raising the stakes by strategically revealing important bits of information throughout the story. You also purposefully mislead the audience about one aspect of the story and then reveal your twist near the midpoint. So my question is, how did you go about plotting out the story? Were you aiming for a big reveal every however-many pages, or did the structure work itself out in a more organic way?

Ken Aguado: Let me first say that I’m not a fan of most faith films I see. While I appreciate their message and intent, many of them play more like 90-minute “prayer rallies” than cinema. I am a Hollywood guy, so I vowed that my version of a faith film would contain the narrative values I love. An Interview with God is really more of a character mystery than anything else, with two to three major plot twists along the way, including the one big misdirection you cite. The film is not what most people are expecting, based on the concept.

To plot the film, I just did a two to three page outline, by acts, with the twists, by acts. Maybe I didn’t know better! But I am not a big believer in the 20 page outlines that some writers do. And, as a producer, I never like to get those long outlines from the writers I work with, although they might do a detailed outline for themselves. As it turned out, my script ended up very close to the layout I did in my outline.

Angela Bourassa: The premise of getting a chance to ask God all of your questions is so enticing. I’d imagine it could have been very easy to make this a 200-page script with all the various topics you might be tempted to include. And I know that’s a problem that writers in all genres face when they’re delving into a world that personally fascinates them. How did you go about crafting the interview scenes so that they kept pushing the story forward?

Ken Aguado: That’s a great question and the short answer is that I was very mindful of not letting my personal obsessions get the better of me. The long answer is that my general inclination is to underwrite, and I did not let the dialogue go “naturalistic,” which tends to eat up the page count as characters fumble to communicate. The scenes are very focused and play more like a tennis match or battle of wills. And, as a producer, I wanted the option of making this film for very low cost, so I limited my first draft to 90 pages. The shooting draft ended up at 99 pages, after I incorporated notes and expanded the scope a bit.

Angela Bourassa: Final question. What advice would you offer to someone who wants to use their script to get across a particular message? Not necessarily a religious message, but any sort of moral or lesson.

Ken Aguado: That’s another great question. In one sense, all screenwriters should have a message, or theme, in their work, even though most commercial films and series are pretty simplistic such as, “Good triumphs over evil” or, “To find love, you must first love yourself.” I think “message” becomes a problem when the viewer senses more agenda than entertainment. I like to half-joke that the plot of every film or TV series is just people we like not getting the things they want. But this is another way of saying, stay focused on creating compelling characters and give us a reason to turn the page. This is what I tried to do with An Interview with God. And if the film also makes you think, that’d be fine with me.

Update: An Interview with God is currently available on Netflix.


Angela Bourassa is the founder of LA Screenwriter and the co-founder of Write/LA, a screenwriting competition created by writers, for writers. A mom, UCLA grad, and alternating repeat binger of The Office and Parks and Recreation, Angela posts articles through @LA_Screenwriter and unique daily writing prompts through @Write_LA.

8 thoughts on “AN INTERVIEW WITH GOD: A Chat with Writer/Producer Ken Aguado

Add yours

  1. As a believer, I found this to be a real page turner that kept my attention. I could see two of the plot twists coming but the mistress that turned out to be the loving sister in law was a wonderful surprise! We need more writing like this.

  2. Greetings Ken, due to the personal content of this message within a public forum I have to omit my name, but please email me if you would like to know it. I have something of interest to share with you Ken. My wife and I watched your movie because I was browsing Netflix and I chose it. This movie spoke so supernaturally to us that we had to pause the movie a couple times and re-compose ourselves. My wife ended up crying. This movie spoke to us supernaturally in the following ways. We noticed that the movie was initially released and viewed on August 20th, 21st, and 22nd. I was born on August 22nd. The main character was going through a failing marriage, at the time my wife and I’s marriage was failing. The main character was told by God that he was going to experience death soon at his own hand if he didn’t change. I had the same experience occur, a week before we watched the movie on the same day. Fortunately, I did change. The last time that the main character spoke to God in person in the movie was in room 22. Aside from my day of birth being August 22, I recently signed a work contract and I was given my own office, the office number is room 22. The run-time of the movie at the time the main character entered room 22 was 1:11. My wife and I both know that 111 is a number that has been used to supernaturally communicate with me time and time again in my life, usually also involving designed synchronicity. The most powerful instance this happened is when the supernatural communication told me that I was it’s child through a means that involved that number. The last date that the main character spoke to God was on 6/3. June 3rd was the same day that I had a confirmed encounter with a supernatural being, which I later wrote about. This encounter can be verified through documented proof from a Boston College professor who is also a famous author and international public speaker. The day I began my work contract was on the same day that this same supernatural being is celebrated around the world (February 1st). The supernatural implications of this movie to my personal life are too striking and direct to ignore. I thought I’d reach out to you so you could possibly answer some questions I have. This movie may have saved my life, or should I say God may have saved my life through this movie. This was literally a supernatural intervention. Please respond Ken, I thank you in advance.

      1. So you coincidentally approved my comment and posted a response on the 22nd, which adds to the synchronicity involving the number 22. Was that unintentional?

      2. Well Angela, thank you for the apology and I was not offended at all. Thank you for posting my message. Stay safe out there. Hopefully Ken can respond :-).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Baskerville 2 by Anders Noren.

Up ↑